Thursday, October 15, 2009

Blackface Keeps Rearing it's Racist Head

What the heck was famous American photographer, Steven Klein, thinking? Creativity? I think not... blackface is hardly something new. Was he trying to treat blackface like the word "nigger" and change it to a cool "nigga"; trying to reverse the power of its meaning from something negative to something positive? Well, many are yet to get over their awful racist run-ins full of nigger this and you nigger that and have not taken the use of the word nigga lightly.


Were there NO black employees who saw this and thought that it would possibly be too offensive? It's a direct slap in the face to know that black models are already not the color of choice and have no blacks in your issue, yet instead hire a European woman to play a black role. A black model could have easily filled that slot and been absolutely flawless in her own skin.


You know, maybe there is a perfect explanation as to why this has occurred. Maybe they sent a European model over not knowing what the vision of the photographer was. I'm guessing that the photographer and French Vogue just forgot to mention that the model needed to be black. Or maybe they were doing like what Tyra did on ANTM by turning a white model black and vice versa - switching ethnicities overall. Idk.


What was French Vogue thinking? I mean really. Have you no black American relations or respect? Are you clueless of the purpose of blackface - to degrade and poke at the black race? Is this your way of telling blacks to "get over it already"? Well tell that to the Jews (who get reparations* by the way)... and watch your funding go down the drain, right?


Lara Stone is the model. Lara, you are just as crazy as the rest of them and probably figured it would just add more attention to you. As a foreign, early 20 something, I'm sure you could care less. But hey, maybe you simply didn't know. And what gets me is that they use Lara (a supermodel) as if she is a pinnacle.


Maybe I wouldn't be so offended had there been black supermodels throughout the mag... but that's hardly seen in Vogue anyway. We have our token black girls and the rest of us are too common. But yes, I'd still be offended anyway. But how can you have an issue dedicated to supermodels and not have one "black face" in it? Thus, the sting of insult.


Steven, I don't care how many black friends you have. Vogue, I don't care how many black people you have hired... you both have just insulted them all; every friend, every colleague, and America. You have made your statement. You really don't know black people AT ALL. It's never okay to do blackface. Just look at Whoopi Goldberg and Ted Danson when he did blackface for her roast. Of course she had to defend him; she was in love with him! But as you can see... the two of them are no more. I'm convinced it's probably because she quietly saw the stupidy of misunderstanding and it created a divide - at least I wouldn't be surprised. If Ted couldn't even do blackface in a roast without creating a frenzy, then how the heck do you feel you can do it? Idk, maybe you wanted that sort of attention.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Why Preachers or Ministers Should NOT Charge for God's Word

Don't you hate it when you have heard part of a great sermon series only to have to pay $30 or so in order to hear it "in it's entirety"? That has really discouraged me at times because I know that I will most likely NEVER come around to purchasing the series - do you?

We have heard reasons as to why ministers charge for their sermons - production costs, materials, customer service, etc. But lets see why ministers should NOT charge. Maybe if the issue of money was taken out the mixxx, there could be more people getting saved, getting stronger, being holy, and walking with more confidence in God and His words due to the accessibility of the Gospels. By the way, this post is not to hate on those who do charge, but I do want to give them something to think about - especially if the ministry is small.


John Piper is the pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church. Lets see what John Piper and his ministry have to say about [not] charging for sermons and how they make due. To read their entire story click here, but here are their main points.


Why We Do Not Charge Money for Audio and Video Online...
We have placed our entire audio and video archive of John Piper’s Sunday sermons on our website so that you and others around the world can benefit from them free of charge. You can stream them, download them, copy them, and give them to others—for free. We don’t just permit you to do it. We encourage you to do it!
Here’s why...
1.
We could make more money if we sell the sermons. But we believe that over the years hundreds of thousands more people will listen to or watch these sermons if we don’t charge money for them. And since “faith comes by hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Rom. 10:17), if more people hear the word of Christ, then, Lord willing, more people will become more passionately in love with Christ
2. -A seminary student in Cameroon, Africa, where the average person makes $800 per year, being able to use a school computer with internet access to listen to sermons which he could not afford otherwise.
-Reducing the risk that a missionary in a Persian Gulf or Asian communist nation will be exposed to government internet monitors by eliminating the registration and financial transaction process.
-A bi-vocational pastor receiving regular spiritual nourishment and encouragement without further taxing his limited budget.
-A university student burning sermons to a CD and giving them to dorm mates.
-A seminary professor assigning students to listen to online sermons without burdening them with further costs.
-A missionary support team downloading hundreds of sermons onto CDs to send to their missionary family located in a remote area.
-An English-speaking Christian in Russia streaming sermons on Sunday afternoons as a means of increasing his or her theological education.

3. Removing Obstacles To the Gospel: ...we look to the Apostle Paul’s example of how to remove obstacles to this goal. In 2 Corinthians 2:17 he says,
We are not, like so many, peddlers of God's word, but as men of sincerity, as commissioned by God, in the sight of God we speak in Christ.
In Paul’s day, as in ours, many used the Word of God as a means to profit financially.
And as a result, they discredited the gospel and gave legitimate ministries a bad name.
Paul was zealous to distance himself not only from this motive, but also from the appearance of it. He was persuaded that appearances of peddling the gospel of free grace would put a stumbling block in the way of the gospel. It would make it harder for people to see the true nature of the message and the Savior. This is why he wrote in 1 Corinthians 9:6–7, 12:
Is it only Barnabas and I who have no right to refrain from working for a living? Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of the milk? . . . Nevertheless, we have not made use of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ.
The issue for Paul was not what is rightfully permitted, but what was the most radically fruitful, as God helped him discern his situation. Similar to Paul, we discern the Lord’s call on us to offer the preaching of the gospel without charge on the internet in order to remove obstacles. Here are some plausible examples:
-Imagine a Christian who, following the death of a family member, emails an online sermon to ten unbelieving relatives who would never listen to Christian radio, but might, in a time of grief, listen to one of John’s sermons on death or suffering with no more effort than a mouse click. One or two of them might browse the website, opening up a whole new world of connections for ministry.

-Or, imagine someone who would never pay to listen to a sermon or even attend a church, because of a negative past experience, listening to a free message online because a coworker recommended it—and being converted!

It’s for countless possible scenarios like these that we are choosing not to charge money for our online sermons. When the Word of Christ came into the world, it came without cost to the hearers. Jesus said to his disciples when he sent them out to preach, “You received without paying; give without pay” (Matt. 10:8). That’s what we wish to do with these sermons.
How Will We Pay for Free Online Sermons?
It cost money for Paul to preach the gospel in Corinth. But he did not ask for money from the relatively wealthy Corinthians so that they wouldn’t stumble over any appearance of profiteering. Instead he trusted God to provide for his needs through the work of his own hands, as well as through the financial support of Christians in other cities who partnered with him in the spread of the gospel. We love his example.
In order to pay for the costs of sustaining our internet ministry, we have resolved to trust God to provide us with partners who believe in this mission and want to financially support it. And this work is continually expanding. We are regularly adding new sermons to the archive, as well as other messages such as narrative poems, seminars, event messages, biographies, and more. The cost of audio and video production as well as the cost of maintaining the site, purchasing server space, and buying bandwidth are constants. So we will let our needs be known to those who are interested and give friends an opportunity to join us in the incredible joy of reaching millions of people with the free Word of Christ.
Would you like to join us?


Other churches that post their entire sermons online for free: